RUBNS vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of RUBNS and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | RUBNS | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 18.09 | 75.35 | 9.29 |
| Daily change | −10.00% | −1.89% | −4.01% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.5B | TRY 264.4B | TRY 2.4B |
| P/E | 258.11 | 8.12 | 12.62 |
| P/B | 0.47 | 1.50 | 0.90 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 2.75% |
| Return on equity | 0.21% | 19.65% | 0.38% |
| Free float | 58.84% | 17.66% | 33.00% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the RUBNS vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of RUBNS (Rubenis Tekstil) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:53. Of the 16 metrics compared, RUBNS leads in 9 and FROTO leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−1.89% vs −10.00%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 264.4B vs TRY 1.5B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 258.11). P/B: RUBNS leads (0.47 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: RUBNS leads (6.84 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 2.83). Gross margin: RUBNS leads (25.21% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): RUBNS leads (17.98% vs 6.30%).
Frequently asked questions
Is RUBNS or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (258.11 vs 8.12); by P/B, RUBNS trades at the lower multiple (0.47 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, RUBNS or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 0.42% for RUBNS and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 0.21% for RUBNS and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, RUBNS or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 17.12 for RUBNS and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 0.73 for RUBNS and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.