ONCSM vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ONCSM and TUPRS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ONCSM | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 83.80 | 400.00 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −5.95% | −1.48% | −5.57% |
| Market cap | TRY 2B | TRY 770.7B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 26.70 | 10.75 | 17.35 |
| P/B | 4.21 | 1.72 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 18.26% | 18.20% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 40.86% | 49.42% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ONCSM vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ONCSM (Oncosem Onkolojik Sistemler) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:44. Of the 16 metrics compared, ONCSM leads in 8 and TUPRS leads in 8.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.48% vs −5.95%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 770.7B vs TRY 2B). P/E: TUPRS leads (10.75 vs 26.70). P/B: TUPRS leads (1.72 vs 4.21). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 7.50). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 4.76). Gross margin: ONCSM leads (54.30% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): ONCSM leads (41.91% vs 10.32%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ONCSM or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, TUPRS is cheaper (26.70 vs 10.75); by P/B, TUPRS trades at the lower multiple (4.21 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, ONCSM or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 10.83% for ONCSM and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 18.26% for ONCSM and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, ONCSM or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 44.59 for ONCSM and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 0.48 for ONCSM and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.