OFSYM vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of OFSYM and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | OFSYM | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 57.85 | 292.50 | 10.97 |
| Daily change | −3.90% | 0.86% | −4.16% |
| Market cap | TRY 8.5B | TRY 96.5B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 25.56 | — | 13.61 |
| P/B | 1.74 | 12.48 | 0.89 |
| Dividend yield | 0.70% | — | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | 7.72% | −13.03% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 14.38% | 0.54% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the OFSYM vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of OFSYM (Ofis Yem Gida) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:17. Of the 15 metrics compared, OFSYM leads in 9 and KENT leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −3.90%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 8.5B). P/B: OFSYM leads (1.74 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: OFSYM leads (9.77 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: OFSYM leads (1.28 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 12.51%). EBITDA margin (annual): OFSYM leads (9.21% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): OFSYM leads (1.92% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is OFSYM or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (25.56 vs —); by P/B, OFSYM trades at the lower multiple (1.74 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, OFSYM or KENT?
Annual net margin is 1.92% for OFSYM and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 7.72% for OFSYM and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, OFSYM or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 55.36 for OFSYM and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 2.96 for OFSYM and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.