MRGYO vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of MRGYO and TUPRS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MRGYO | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.02 | 398.75 | 6.79 |
| Daily change | −4.67% | −1.79% | −3.53% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.4B | TRY 768.3B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 1.55 | 10.75 | 7.35 |
| P/B | 0.18 | 1.72 | 0.45 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 1.34% |
| Return on equity | 13.32% | 18.20% | 0.92% |
| Free float | 68.48% | 49.42% | 28.00% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MRGYO vs TUPRS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of MRGYO (Marti GMYO) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:34. Of the 15 metrics compared, MRGYO leads in 8 and TUPRS leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.79% vs −4.67%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 768.3B vs TRY 2.4B). P/E: MRGYO leads (1.55 vs 10.75). P/B: MRGYO leads (0.18 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 31.19). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 92.45). Gross margin: MRGYO leads (83.44% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): MRGYO leads (59.42% vs 10.32%).
Frequently asked questions
Is MRGYO or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, MRGYO is cheaper (1.55 vs 10.75); by P/B, MRGYO trades at the lower multiple (0.18 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, MRGYO or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 826.59% for MRGYO and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 13.32% for MRGYO and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, MRGYO or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 29.91 for MRGYO and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is 9.60 for MRGYO and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.