MRGYO vs KARTN Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of MRGYO and KARTN side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MRGYO | KARTN | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.03 | 91.75 | 6.80 |
| Daily change | −3.74% | −9.96% | −3.51% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.5B | TRY 6.9B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 1.55 | — | 7.35 |
| P/B | 0.18 | 2.62 | 0.45 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.52% | 1.34% |
| Return on equity | 13.32% | −20.89% | 0.92% |
| Free float | 68.48% | 40.99% | 28.00% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MRGYO vs KARTN comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of MRGYO (Marti GMYO) and KARTN (Kartonsan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:54. Of the 13 metrics compared, MRGYO leads in 11 and KARTN leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: MRGYO leads (−3.74% vs −9.96%). Market cap: KARTN leads (TRY 6.9B vs TRY 2.5B). P/B: MRGYO leads (0.18 vs 2.62). EV/EBITDA: MRGYO leads (31.19 vs −11.42). EV/Sales: KARTN leads (3.87 vs 92.45). Gross margin: MRGYO leads (83.44% vs −15.81%). EBITDA margin (annual): MRGYO leads (59.42% vs −17.87%). Net margin (annual): MRGYO leads (826.59% vs −16.67%).
Frequently asked questions
Is MRGYO or KARTN cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (1.55 vs —); by P/B, MRGYO trades at the lower multiple (0.18 vs 2.62).
Which is more profitable, MRGYO or KARTN?
Annual net margin is 826.59% for MRGYO and −16.67% for KARTN; return on equity is 13.32% for MRGYO and −20.89% for KARTN.
Which is more leveraged, MRGYO or KARTN?
The leverage ratio is 29.91 for MRGYO and 33.91 for KARTN; net debt/EBITDA is 9.60 for MRGYO and — for KARTN. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.