MMCAS vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of MMCAS and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MMCAS | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 15.53 | 436.25 | 27.70 |
| Daily change | −7.39% | −4.75% | −5.56% |
| Market cap | TRY 207.1M | TRY 145.7B | TRY 7.9B |
| P/E | — | 19.22 | 12.39 |
| P/B | 17.01 | 3.89 | 1.36 |
| Return on equity | −21.56% | 23.87% | 6.37% |
| Free float | 92.92% | 20.28% | 28.26% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MMCAS vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of MMCAS (Mmc San. ve Tic. Yat.) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 8 metrics compared, MMCAS leads in 2 and GUBRF leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: GUBRF leads (−4.75% vs −7.39%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 145.7B vs TRY 207.1M). P/B: GUBRF leads (3.89 vs 17.01). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −0.06%). Return on assets: GUBRF leads (11.35% vs −9.99%). Return on equity: GUBRF leads (23.87% vs −21.56%). Current ratio: MMCAS leads (3.03 vs 1.63). Leverage ratio: MMCAS leads (31.20 vs 41.50).
Frequently asked questions
Is MMCAS or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 19.22); by P/B, GUBRF trades at the lower multiple (17.01 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, MMCAS or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −0.06% for MMCAS and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is −21.56% for MMCAS and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, MMCAS or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 31.20 for MMCAS and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is — for MMCAS and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.