MMCAS vs CRDFA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of MMCAS and CRDFA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MMCAS | CRDFA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 15.53 | 8.98 | 27.57 |
| Daily change | −7.39% | −9.93% | −4.82% |
| Market cap | TRY 207.1M | TRY 2.7B | TRY 7.9B |
| P/E | — | 11.80 | 12.39 |
| P/B | 17.01 | 8.61 | 1.36 |
| Return on equity | −21.56% | 111.09% | 6.37% |
| Free float | 92.92% | 51.94% | 28.26% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MMCAS vs CRDFA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of MMCAS (Mmc San. ve Tic. Yat.) and CRDFA (Creditwest Faktoring) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 6 metrics compared, MMCAS leads in 1 and CRDFA leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: MMCAS leads (−7.39% vs −9.93%). Market cap: CRDFA leads (TRY 2.7B vs TRY 207.1M). P/B: CRDFA leads (8.61 vs 17.01). Net margin (annual): CRDFA leads (306.98% vs −0.06%). Return on assets: CRDFA leads (53.98% vs −9.99%). Return on equity: CRDFA leads (111.09% vs −21.56%).
Frequently asked questions
Is MMCAS or CRDFA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 11.80); by P/B, CRDFA trades at the lower multiple (17.01 vs 8.61).
Which is more profitable, MMCAS or CRDFA?
Annual net margin is −0.06% for MMCAS and 306.98% for CRDFA; return on equity is −21.56% for MMCAS and 111.09% for CRDFA.
Which is more leveraged, MMCAS or CRDFA?
The leverage ratio is 31.20 for MMCAS and — for CRDFA; net debt/EBITDA is — for MMCAS and — for CRDFA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.