MARBL vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of MARBL and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MARBL | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 8.98 | 1.75 | 15.64 |
| Daily change | −5.67% | −3.85% | −6.87% |
| Market cap | TRY 2.1B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 25.12 |
| P/B | 0.83 | 0.19 | 0.99 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | — | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | −1.76% | 9.45% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 26.89% | 79.42% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MARBL vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of MARBL (Tureks Turunc Madencilik) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:18. Of the 14 metrics compared, MARBL leads in 3 and GLRYH leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−3.85% vs −5.67%). Market cap: MARBL leads (TRY 2.1B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.83). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 6.65). EV/Sales: MARBL leads (1.74 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 38.15%). EBITDA margin (annual): MARBL leads (22.79% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −1.28%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MARBL or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.83 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, MARBL or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −1.28% for MARBL and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −1.76% for MARBL and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, MARBL or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 43.86 for MARBL and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 1.20 for MARBL and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.