LUKSK vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of LUKSK and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | LUKSK | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 64.95 | 292.50 | 9.31 |
| Daily change | −5.39% | 0.86% | −3.68% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.8B | TRY 96.5B | TRY 2.4B |
| P/E | 58.16 | — | 12.62 |
| P/B | 1.12 | 12.48 | 0.90 |
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | — | 2.75% |
| Return on equity | 2.15% | −13.03% | 0.38% |
| Free float | 16.95% | 0.54% | 33.00% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the LUKSK vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of LUKSK (Luks Kadife) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:41. Of the 15 metrics compared, LUKSK leads in 11 and KENT leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −5.39%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 1.8B). P/B: LUKSK leads (1.12 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: LUKSK leads (143.26 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: LUKSK leads (7.04 vs 11.82). Gross margin: LUKSK leads (26.88% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): LUKSK leads (8.79% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): LUKSK leads (6.91% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is LUKSK or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (58.16 vs —); by P/B, LUKSK trades at the lower multiple (1.12 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, LUKSK or KENT?
Annual net margin is 6.91% for LUKSK and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 2.15% for LUKSK and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, LUKSK or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 25.81 for LUKSK and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 0.75 for LUKSK and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.