LOGO vs TTRAK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of LOGO and TTRAK side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | LOGO | TTRAK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 138.30 | 398.75 | 25.80 |
| Daily change | −1.21% | −2.03% | −5.05% |
| Market cap | TRY 13.1B | TRY 39.9B | TRY 3.5B |
| P/E | 14.96 | — | 16.47 |
| P/B | 3.00 | 2.15 | 2.62 |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | 6.12% | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | 22.33% | −5.13% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 61.32% | 24.94% | 38.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the LOGO vs TTRAK comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of LOGO (Logo Yazilim) and TTRAK (Türk Traktor) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:18. Of the 16 metrics compared, LOGO leads in 11 and TTRAK leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: LOGO leads (−1.21% vs −2.03%). Market cap: TTRAK leads (TRY 39.9B vs TRY 13.1B). P/B: TTRAK leads (2.15 vs 3.00). EV/EBITDA: LOGO leads (6.06 vs 19.57). EV/Sales: TTRAK leads (2.10 vs 3.63). Dividend yield: TTRAK leads (6.12% vs 3.61%). Gross margin: LOGO leads (97.44% vs 7.91%). EBITDA margin (annual): LOGO leads (48.14% vs 8.53%).
Frequently asked questions
Is LOGO or TTRAK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (14.96 vs —); by P/B, TTRAK trades at the lower multiple (3.00 vs 2.15).
Which is more profitable, LOGO or TTRAK?
Annual net margin is 14.84% for LOGO and −2.11% for TTRAK; return on equity is 22.33% for LOGO and −5.13% for TTRAK.
Which is more leveraged, LOGO or TTRAK?
The leverage ratio is 49.02 for LOGO and 55.16 for TTRAK; net debt/EBITDA is −0.37 for LOGO and 2.43 for TTRAK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.