LOGO vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of LOGO and GUBRF side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | LOGO | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 138.30 | 437.25 | 25.80 |
| Daily change | −1.21% | −4.53% | −5.11% |
| Market cap | TRY 13.1B | TRY 146B | TRY 3.5B |
| P/E | 14.96 | 19.22 | 16.47 |
| P/B | 3.00 | 3.89 | 2.62 |
| Dividend yield | 3.61% | — | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | 22.33% | 23.87% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 61.32% | 20.28% | 38.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the LOGO vs GUBRF comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of LOGO (Logo Yazilim) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:18. Of the 16 metrics compared, LOGO leads in 10 and GUBRF leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: LOGO leads (−1.21% vs −4.53%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 146B vs TRY 13.1B). P/E: LOGO leads (14.96 vs 19.22). P/B: LOGO leads (3.00 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: LOGO leads (6.06 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: LOGO leads (3.63 vs 3.90). Gross margin: LOGO leads (97.44% vs 26.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): LOGO leads (48.14% vs 22.84%).
Frequently asked questions
Is LOGO or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, LOGO is cheaper (14.96 vs 19.22); by P/B, LOGO trades at the lower multiple (3.00 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, LOGO or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is 14.84% for LOGO and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is 22.33% for LOGO and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, LOGO or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 49.02 for LOGO and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is −0.37 for LOGO and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.