KZBGY vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KZBGY and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KZBGY | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.38 | 75.40 | 6.82 |
| Daily change | −2.82% | −1.82% | −3.55% |
| Market cap | TRY 5.5B | TRY 264.6B | TRY 5.6B |
| P/E | 10.50 | 8.12 | 7.35 |
| P/B | 0.22 | 1.50 | 0.45 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 1.34% |
| Return on equity | 2.36% | 19.65% | 0.92% |
| Free float | 34.78% | 17.66% | 28.00% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KZBGY vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KZBGY (Kizilbuk GYO) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:42. Of the 16 metrics compared, KZBGY leads in 7 and FROTO leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−1.82% vs −2.82%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 264.6B vs TRY 5.5B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 10.50). P/B: KZBGY leads (0.22 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 13.85). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 9.28). Gross margin: KZBGY leads (78.16% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): KZBGY leads (49.08% vs 6.30%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KZBGY or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (10.50 vs 8.12); by P/B, KZBGY trades at the lower multiple (0.22 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, KZBGY or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 30.47% for KZBGY and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 2.36% for KZBGY and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, KZBGY or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 39.02 for KZBGY and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 5.40 for KZBGY and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.