KENT vs TURGG Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and TURGG side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KENT | TURGG | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 292.50 | 24.18 | 10.97 |
| Daily change | 0.86% | −3.97% | −4.04% |
| Market cap | TRY 96.5B | TRY 3.1B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 11.26 | 13.61 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 1.21 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 12.18% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 23.33% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KENT vs TURGG comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and TURGG (Turker Proje Gayrimenkul) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 10 metrics compared, KENT leads in 3 and TURGG leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −3.97%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 3.1B). P/B: TURGG leads (1.21 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: KENT leads (276.46 vs −150.78). Net margin (annual): TURGG leads (3.59% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: TURGG leads (9.27% vs −7.29%). Return on equity: TURGG leads (12.18% vs −13.03%). Current ratio: TURGG leads (13.36 vs 1.22).
Frequently asked questions
Is KENT or TURGG cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 11.26); by P/B, TURGG trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 1.21).
Which is more profitable, KENT or TURGG?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 3.59% for TURGG; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 12.18% for TURGG.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or TURGG?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 24.13 for TURGG; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and — for TURGG. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.