KENT vs SAMAT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and SAMAT side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | SAMAT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 281.00 | 4.02 | 10.87 |
| Daily change | −3.10% | −4.74% | −5.52% |
| Market cap | TRY 92.7B | TRY 451.8M | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 3.15 | 13.64 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 0.64 | 0.86 |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 26.15% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 78.90% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs SAMAT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and SAMAT (Saray Matbaacilik) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:00. Of the 12 metrics compared, KENT leads in 7 and SAMAT leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−3.10% vs −4.74%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 92.7B vs TRY 451.8M). P/B: SAMAT leads (0.64 vs 12.48). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.82 vs 34,240.99). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs −22.99%). EBITDA margin (annual): KENT leads (5.65% vs −258,692.48%). Net margin (annual): SAMAT leads (406.63% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: SAMAT leads (18.22% vs −7.29%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or SAMAT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 3.15); by P/B, SAMAT trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 0.64).
Which is more profitable, KENT or SAMAT?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 406.63% for SAMAT; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 26.15% for SAMAT.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or SAMAT?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 26.52 for SAMAT; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and — for SAMAT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.