KENT vs PRZMA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and PRZMA side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KENT | PRZMA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 292.50 | 27.14 | 10.98 |
| Daily change | 0.86% | −9.95% | −4.10% |
| Market cap | TRY 96.5B | TRY 2.1B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/B | 12.48 | 2.48 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | −22.86% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 70.05% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KENT vs PRZMA comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and PRZMA (Prizma Press Matbaacilik) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, KENT leads in 10 and PRZMA leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −9.95%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 2.1B). P/B: PRZMA leads (2.48 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: PRZMA leads (126.40 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.82 vs 12.71). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 2.88%). EBITDA margin (annual): PRZMA leads (6.28% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): KENT leads (−6.14% vs −65.97%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KENT or PRZMA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, PRZMA trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 2.48).
Which is more profitable, KENT or PRZMA?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and −65.97% for PRZMA; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and −22.86% for PRZMA.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or PRZMA?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 21.70 for PRZMA; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and 2.14 for PRZMA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.