KENT vs OYAKC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and OYAKC side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | OYAKC | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 281.00 | 20.48 | 10.78 |
| Daily change | −3.10% | −2.94% | −5.15% |
| Market cap | TRY 92.7B | TRY 99.6B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 13.26 | 13.53 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 1.35 | 0.85 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.69% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 11.44% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 19.30% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs OYAKC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and OYAKC (Oyak Çimento) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:00. Of the 13 metrics compared, KENT leads in 0 and OYAKC leads in 13.
Highlights: Daily change: OYAKC leads (−2.94% vs −3.10%). Market cap: OYAKC leads (TRY 99.6B vs TRY 92.7B). P/B: OYAKC leads (1.35 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: OYAKC leads (6.70 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: OYAKC leads (3.39 vs 11.82). Gross margin: OYAKC leads (23.75% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): OYAKC leads (6.29% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): OYAKC leads (14.68% vs −6.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or OYAKC cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 13.26); by P/B, OYAKC trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 1.35).
Which is more profitable, KENT or OYAKC?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 14.68% for OYAKC; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 11.44% for OYAKC.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or OYAKC?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 18.32 for OYAKC; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and — for OYAKC. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.