KENT vs OFSYM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and OFSYM side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | OFSYM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 289.00 | 57.00 | 10.86 |
| Daily change | −0.34% | −5.32% | −5.00% |
| Market cap | TRY 95.4B | TRY 8.3B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 25.56 | 13.64 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 1.74 | 0.86 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.70% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 7.72% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 14.38% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs OFSYM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and OFSYM (Ofis Yem Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, KENT leads in 6 and OFSYM leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−0.34% vs −5.32%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 95.4B vs TRY 8.3B). P/B: OFSYM leads (1.74 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: OFSYM leads (9.77 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: OFSYM leads (1.28 vs 11.82). Gross margin: KENT leads (14.39% vs 12.51%). EBITDA margin (annual): OFSYM leads (9.21% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): OFSYM leads (1.92% vs −6.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or OFSYM cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 25.56); by P/B, OFSYM trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 1.74).
Which is more profitable, KENT or OFSYM?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 1.92% for OFSYM; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 7.72% for OFSYM.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or OFSYM?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 55.36 for OFSYM; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and 2.96 for OFSYM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.