KENT vs LUKSK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and LUKSK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | LUKSK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 289.00 | 63.80 | 10.87 |
| Daily change | −0.34% | −7.06% | −5.17% |
| Market cap | TRY 95.4B | TRY 1.8B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 58.16 | 13.64 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 1.12 | 0.86 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.60% | 1.23% |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 2.15% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 16.95% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs LUKSK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and LUKSK (Luks Kadife) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:00. Of the 15 metrics compared, KENT leads in 4 and LUKSK leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−0.34% vs −7.06%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 95.4B vs TRY 1.8B). P/B: LUKSK leads (1.12 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: LUKSK leads (143.26 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: LUKSK leads (7.04 vs 11.82). Gross margin: LUKSK leads (26.88% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): LUKSK leads (8.79% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): LUKSK leads (6.91% vs −6.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or LUKSK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 58.16); by P/B, LUKSK trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 1.12).
Which is more profitable, KENT or LUKSK?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 6.91% for LUKSK; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 2.15% for LUKSK.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or LUKSK?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 25.81 for LUKSK; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and 0.75 for LUKSK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.