KENT vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and GLRYH side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KENT | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 292.50 | 1.77 | 10.97 |
| Daily change | 0.86% | −2.75% | −4.03% |
| Market cap | TRY 96.5B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 13.61 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 0.19 | 0.89 |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 9.45% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 79.42% | 32.02% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KENT vs GLRYH comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 10:00. Of the 14 metrics compared, KENT leads in 5 and GLRYH leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −2.75%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: KENT leads (11.82 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): KENT leads (5.65% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is KENT or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, KENT or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.