KENT vs GARFA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KENT and GARFA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KENT | GARFA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 281.00 | 22.44 | 10.87 |
| Daily change | −3.10% | −5.63% | −5.48% |
| Market cap | TRY 92.7B | TRY 8.9B | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | — | 3.60 | 13.64 |
| P/B | 12.48 | 1.40 | 0.86 |
| Return on equity | −13.03% | 45.56% | −0.82% |
| Free float | 0.54% | 8.37% | 32.02% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KENT vs GARFA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KENT (Kent Gida) and GARFA (Garanti Faktoring) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:00. Of the 6 metrics compared, KENT leads in 2 and GARFA leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (−3.10% vs −5.63%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 92.7B vs TRY 8.9B). P/B: GARFA leads (1.40 vs 12.48). Net margin (annual): GARFA leads (18.74% vs −6.14%). Return on assets: GARFA leads (7.06% vs −7.29%). Return on equity: GARFA leads (45.56% vs −13.03%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KENT or GARFA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 3.60); by P/B, GARFA trades at the lower multiple (12.48 vs 1.40).
Which is more profitable, KENT or GARFA?
Annual net margin is −6.14% for KENT and 18.74% for GARFA; return on equity is −13.03% for KENT and 45.56% for GARFA.
Which is more leveraged, KENT or GARFA?
The leverage ratio is 43.40 for KENT and — for GARFA; net debt/EBITDA is 0.00 for KENT and — for GARFA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.