KARTN vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KARTN and GUBRF side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KARTN | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 91.75 | 435.50 | 16.58 |
| Daily change | −9.96% | −4.91% | −5.42% |
| Market cap | TRY 6.9B | TRY 145.5B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/E | — | 19.22 | 6.74 |
| P/B | 2.62 | 3.89 | 1.24 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | — | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −20.89% | 23.87% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 40.99% | 20.28% | 34.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KARTN vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KARTN (Kartonsan) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:20. Of the 14 metrics compared, KARTN leads in 3 and GUBRF leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: GUBRF leads (−4.91% vs −9.96%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 145.5B vs TRY 6.9B). P/B: KARTN leads (2.62 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: GUBRF leads (11.70 vs −11.42). EV/Sales: KARTN leads (3.87 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs −15.81%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs −17.87%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −16.67%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KARTN or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 19.22); by P/B, KARTN trades at the lower multiple (2.62 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, KARTN or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is −16.67% for KARTN and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is −20.89% for KARTN and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, KARTN or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 33.91 for KARTN and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is — for KARTN and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.