KARTN vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of KARTN and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | KARTN | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 91.75 | 1.75 | 16.55 |
| Daily change | −9.96% | −3.85% | −5.21% |
| Market cap | TRY 6.9B | TRY 1.1B | TRY 2.8B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 6.80 |
| P/B | 2.62 | 0.19 | 1.23 |
| Dividend yield | 2.52% | — | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −20.89% | 9.45% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 40.99% | 79.42% | 34.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the KARTN vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of KARTN (Kartonsan) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:55. Of the 14 metrics compared, KARTN leads in 4 and GLRYH leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−3.85% vs −9.96%). Market cap: KARTN leads (TRY 6.9B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 2.62). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs −11.42). EV/Sales: KARTN leads (3.87 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs −15.81%). EBITDA margin (annual): KARTN leads (−17.87% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −16.67%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is KARTN or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (2.62 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, KARTN or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −16.67% for KARTN and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −20.89% for KARTN and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, KARTN or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 33.91 for KARTN and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is — for KARTN and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.