INGRM vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of INGRM and FROTO side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | INGRM | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 308.00 | 75.55 | 25.94 |
| Daily change | −2.30% | −1.63% | −4.56% |
| Market cap | TRY 7.4B | TRY 265.1B | TRY 3.5B |
| P/E | 8,810.59 | 8.12 | 16.47 |
| P/B | 3.55 | 1.50 | 2.62 |
| Dividend yield | 1.95% | 3.36% | 1.95% |
| Return on equity | 0.04% | 19.65% | 4.43% |
| Free float | 8.40% | 17.66% | 38.56% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the INGRM vs FROTO comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of INGRM (Ingram Bilişim) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:41. Of the 17 metrics compared, INGRM leads in 4 and FROTO leads in 13.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−1.63% vs −2.30%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 265.1B vs TRY 7.4B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 8,810.59). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 3.55). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 15.23). EV/Sales: INGRM leads (0.77 vs 0.89). Dividend yield: FROTO leads (3.36% vs 1.95%). Gross margin: FROTO leads (6.87% vs 5.64%).
Frequently asked questions
Is INGRM or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (8,810.59 vs 8.12); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (3.55 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, INGRM or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 0.00% for INGRM and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is 0.04% for INGRM and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, INGRM or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 87.25 for INGRM and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is 5.34 for INGRM and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.