ICUGS vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of ICUGS and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ICUGS | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.63 | 1.75 | 18.36 |
| Daily change | −9.94% | −3.85% | −4.13% |
| Market cap | TRY 566.4M | TRY 1.1B | TRY 7.5B |
| P/E | — | 2.32 | 9.53 |
| P/B | 1.35 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Return on equity | −49.69% | 9.45% | 3.00% |
| Free float | 91.40% | 79.42% | 36.51% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ICUGS vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of ICUGS (Icu Girişim) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:51. Of the 8 metrics compared, ICUGS leads in 1 and GLRYH leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−3.85% vs −9.94%). Market cap: GLRYH leads (TRY 1.1B vs TRY 566.4M). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.35). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −23.08%). Return on assets: GLRYH leads (1.75% vs −43.16%). Return on equity: GLRYH leads (9.45% vs −49.69%). Current ratio: GLRYH leads (2.13 vs 0.36). Leverage ratio: ICUGS leads (16.20 vs 37.89).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is ICUGS or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (1.35 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, ICUGS or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is −23.08% for ICUGS and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is −49.69% for ICUGS and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, ICUGS or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 16.20 for ICUGS and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is — for ICUGS and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.