HUBVC vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of HUBVC and FROTO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | HUBVC | FROTO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.46 | 74.75 | 7.34 |
| Daily change | −7.59% | −2.67% | −4.95% |
| Market cap | TRY 408.8M | TRY 262.3B | TRY 561.4M |
| P/E | — | 8.12 | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.73 | 1.50 | 0.66 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% | 0.92% |
| Return on equity | −45.30% | 19.65% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 84.45% | 17.66% | 79.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the HUBVC vs FROTO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of HUBVC (Hub Girişim) and FROTO (Ford Otosan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:56. Of the 13 metrics compared, HUBVC leads in 6 and FROTO leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.67% vs −7.59%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 262.3B vs TRY 408.8M). P/B: HUBVC leads (0.73 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs −10.67). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 28.09). Gross margin: HUBVC leads (100.00% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): HUBVC leads (238.06% vs 6.30%). Net margin (annual): HUBVC leads (1,799.96% vs 4.28%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is HUBVC or FROTO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 8.12); by P/B, HUBVC trades at the lower multiple (0.73 vs 1.50).
Which is more profitable, HUBVC or FROTO?
Annual net margin is 1,799.96% for HUBVC and 4.28% for FROTO; return on equity is −45.30% for HUBVC and 19.65% for FROTO.
Which is more leveraged, HUBVC or FROTO?
The leverage ratio is 6.34 for HUBVC and 63.37 for FROTO; net debt/EBITDA is — for HUBVC and 2.29 for FROTO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.