HLGYO vs KENT Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of HLGYO and KENT side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | HLGYO | KENT | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 3.89 | 292.50 | 7.44 |
| Daily change | −4.89% | 0.86% | −3.44% |
| Market cap | TRY 14.9B | TRY 96.5B | TRY 587.6M |
| P/E | 1.15 | — | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.24 | 12.48 | 0.73 |
| Dividend yield | 9.99% | — | 0.92% |
| Return on equity | 25.11% | −13.03% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 18.35% | 0.54% | 79.42% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the HLGYO vs KENT comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of HLGYO (Halk GMYO) and KENT (Kent Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:33. Of the 15 metrics compared, HLGYO leads in 10 and KENT leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: KENT leads (0.86% vs −4.89%). Market cap: KENT leads (TRY 96.5B vs TRY 14.9B). P/B: HLGYO leads (0.24 vs 12.48). EV/EBITDA: HLGYO leads (11.30 vs 276.46). EV/Sales: HLGYO leads (6.68 vs 11.82). Gross margin: HLGYO leads (24.47% vs 14.39%). EBITDA margin (annual): HLGYO leads (17.29% vs 5.65%). Net margin (annual): HLGYO leads (80.55% vs −6.14%).
Frequently asked questions
Is HLGYO or KENT cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (1.15 vs —); by P/B, HLGYO trades at the lower multiple (0.24 vs 12.48).
Which is more profitable, HLGYO or KENT?
Annual net margin is 80.55% for HLGYO and −6.14% for KENT; return on equity is 25.11% for HLGYO and −13.03% for KENT.
Which is more leveraged, HLGYO or KENT?
The leverage ratio is 36.71 for HLGYO and 43.40 for KENT; net debt/EBITDA is 5.67 for HLGYO and 0.00 for KENT. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.