GUBRF vs TRILC Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GUBRF and TRILC side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GUBRF | TRILC | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 436.50 | 0.91 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −4.69% | 1.11% | −4.69% |
| Market cap | TRY 145.8B | TRY 943.7M | TRY 4.4B |
| P/E | 19.22 | — | 18.20 |
| P/B | 3.89 | 0.47 | 1.14 |
| Return on equity | 23.87% | −4.59% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 20.28% | 73.16% | 37.21% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GUBRF vs TRILC comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) and TRILC (Türk İlaç Serum) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:32. Of the 15 metrics compared, GUBRF leads in 10 and TRILC leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: TRILC leads (1.11% vs −4.69%). Market cap: GUBRF leads (TRY 145.8B vs TRY 943.7M). P/B: TRILC leads (0.47 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: TRILC leads (3.67 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: TRILC leads (3.61 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 25.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): TRILC leads (27.80% vs 22.84%). Net margin (annual): GUBRF leads (13.44% vs −1.65%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GUBRF or TRILC cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (19.22 vs —); by P/B, TRILC trades at the lower multiple (3.89 vs 0.47).
Which is more profitable, GUBRF or TRILC?
Annual net margin is 13.44% for GUBRF and −1.65% for TRILC; return on equity is 23.87% for GUBRF and −4.59% for TRILC.
Which is more leveraged, GUBRF or TRILC?
The leverage ratio is 41.50 for GUBRF and 76.53 for TRILC; net debt/EBITDA is −0.39 for GUBRF and 2.88 for TRILC. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.