GLRYH vs SEYKM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and SEYKM side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | SEYKM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.77 | 2.76 | 7.48 |
| Daily change | −2.75% | −3.83% | −3.58% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.1B | TRY 552M | TRY 574.5M |
| P/E | 2.32 | — | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 0.97 | 0.73 |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | −12.24% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 74.83% | 79.42% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GLRYH vs SEYKM comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and SEYKM (Seyitler Kimya) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 11:42. Of the 13 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 8 and SEYKM leads in 5.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−2.75% vs −3.83%). Market cap: GLRYH leads (TRY 1.1B vs TRY 552M). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.97). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 22.16). EV/Sales: SEYKM leads (1.92 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 23.92%). EBITDA margin (annual): SEYKM leads (350.41% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −25.18%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GLRYH or SEYKM cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (2.32 vs —); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 0.97).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or SEYKM?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and −25.18% for SEYKM; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and −12.24% for SEYKM.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or SEYKM?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 11.13 for SEYKM; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and — for SEYKM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.