GLRYH vs MARBL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and MARBL side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | MARBL | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.74 | 9.02 | 7.30 |
| Daily change | −4.40% | −5.25% | −5.05% |
| Market cap | TRY 1B | TRY 2.1B | TRY 554.8M |
| P/E | 2.32 | — | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 0.83 | 0.66 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.39% | 0.92% |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | −1.76% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 26.89% | 79.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRYH vs MARBL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and MARBL (Tureks Turunc Madencilik) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:48. Of the 14 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 11 and MARBL leads in 3.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−4.40% vs −5.25%). Market cap: MARBL leads (TRY 2.1B vs TRY 1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.83). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 6.65). EV/Sales: MARBL leads (1.74 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 38.15%). EBITDA margin (annual): MARBL leads (22.79% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −1.28%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRYH or MARBL cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (2.32 vs —); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 0.83).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or MARBL?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and −1.28% for MARBL; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and −1.76% for MARBL.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or MARBL?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 43.86 for MARBL; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and 1.20 for MARBL. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.