GLRYH vs KARTN Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and KARTN side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | KARTN | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.75 | 91.75 | 7.32 |
| Daily change | −3.85% | −9.96% | −5.02% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.1B | TRY 6.9B | TRY 561.4M |
| P/E | 2.32 | — | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 2.62 | 0.66 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.52% | 0.92% |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | −20.89% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 40.99% | 79.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRYH vs KARTN Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and KARTN (Kartonsan) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:54. Of the 14 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 10 and KARTN leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−3.85% vs −9.96%). Market cap: KARTN leads (TRY 6.9B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 2.62). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs −11.42). EV/Sales: KARTN leads (3.87 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs −15.81%). EBITDA margin (annual): KARTN leads (−17.87% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −16.67%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRYH or KARTN cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (2.32 vs —); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 2.62).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or KARTN?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and −16.67% for KARTN; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and −20.89% for KARTN.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or KARTN?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 33.91 for KARTN; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and — for KARTN. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.