GLRYH vs IMASM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and IMASM side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | IMASM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.77 | 1.53 | 7.37 |
| Daily change | −2.75% | −5.56% | −5.54% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.1B | TRY 1.4B | TRY 552M |
| P/E | 2.32 | — | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 0.43 | 0.66 |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | −14.10% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 70.18% | 79.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRYH vs IMASM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and IMASM (Imas Makina) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 16:40. Of the 14 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 10 and IMASM leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRYH leads (−2.75% vs −5.56%). Market cap: IMASM leads (TRY 1.4B vs TRY 1.1B). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 0.43). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 39.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): IMASM leads (12.61% vs −42.31%). Net margin (annual): GLRYH leads (41.94% vs −17.40%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRYH or IMASM cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (2.32 vs —); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 0.43).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or IMASM?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and −17.40% for IMASM; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and −14.10% for IMASM.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or IMASM?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 44.90 for IMASM; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and 1.83 for IMASM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.