GLRYH vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRYH and CIMSA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRYH | CIMSA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 1.75 | 42.50 | 7.32 |
| Daily change | −3.85% | −0.70% | −5.02% |
| Market cap | TRY 1.1B | TRY 40.2B | TRY 561.4M |
| P/E | 2.32 | 9.32 | 9.24 |
| P/B | 0.19 | 1.08 | 0.66 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% | 0.92% |
| Return on equity | 9.45% | 12.50% | −5.28% |
| Free float | 79.42% | 45.08% | 79.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRYH vs CIMSA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) and CIMSA (Cimsa) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:54. Of the 15 metrics compared, GLRYH leads in 9 and CIMSA leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: CIMSA leads (−0.70% vs −3.85%). Market cap: CIMSA leads (TRY 40.2B vs TRY 1.1B). P/E: GLRYH leads (2.32 vs 9.32). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.08). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 8.12). EV/Sales: CIMSA leads (2.62 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 17.56%). EBITDA margin (annual): CIMSA leads (18.96% vs −42.31%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRYH or CIMSA cheaper?
By P/E, GLRYH is cheaper (2.32 vs 9.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (0.19 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, GLRYH or CIMSA?
Annual net margin is 41.94% for GLRYH and 9.76% for CIMSA; return on equity is 9.45% for GLRYH and 12.50% for CIMSA.
Which is more leveraged, GLRYH or CIMSA?
The leverage ratio is 37.89 for GLRYH and 52.21 for CIMSA; net debt/EBITDA is — for GLRYH and 3.11 for CIMSA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.