GLRMK vs MARBL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRMK and MARBL side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRMK | MARBL | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 139.20 | 9.00 | 15.63 |
| Daily change | −5.18% | −5.46% | −6.81% |
| Market cap | TRY 44.9B | TRY 2.1B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 12.19 | — | 25.12 |
| P/B | 1.67 | 0.83 | 0.99 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.39% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 17.35% | −1.76% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 25.53% | 26.89% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRMK vs MARBL Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) and MARBL (Tureks Turunc Madencilik) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:16. Of the 15 metrics compared, GLRMK leads in 9 and MARBL leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: GLRMK leads (−5.18% vs −5.46%). Market cap: GLRMK leads (TRY 44.9B vs TRY 2.1B). P/B: MARBL leads (0.83 vs 1.67). EV/EBITDA: MARBL leads (6.65 vs 8.02). EV/Sales: MARBL leads (1.74 vs 2.14). Gross margin: MARBL leads (38.15% vs 13.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): MARBL leads (22.79% vs 12.63%). Net margin (annual): GLRMK leads (8.37% vs −1.28%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRMK or MARBL cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (12.19 vs —); by P/B, MARBL trades at the lower multiple (1.67 vs 0.83).
Which is more profitable, GLRMK or MARBL?
Annual net margin is 8.37% for GLRMK and −1.28% for MARBL; return on equity is 17.35% for GLRMK and −1.76% for MARBL.
Which is more leveraged, GLRMK or MARBL?
The leverage ratio is 64.52 for GLRMK and 43.86 for MARBL; net debt/EBITDA is −0.07 for GLRMK and 1.20 for MARBL. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.