GLRMK vs KUTPO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GLRMK and KUTPO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GLRMK | KUTPO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 138.30 | 66.45 | 15.96 |
| Daily change | −1.91% | 0.99% | −1.45% |
| Market cap | TRY 44.6B | TRY 2.7B | TRY 5.5B |
| P/E | 11.71 | — | 24.39 |
| P/B | 1.60 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.07% | 1.87% |
| Return on equity | 17.35% | −0.73% | 1.06% |
| Free float | 24.88% | 25.73% | 26.74% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GLRMK vs KUTPO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GLRMK (Gulermak Agir Sanayi) and KUTPO (Kutahya Porselen) side by side as of Sep 29, 2026, 16:57. Of the 15 metrics compared, GLRMK leads in 5 and KUTPO leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: KUTPO leads (0.99% vs −1.91%). Market cap: GLRMK leads (TRY 44.6B vs TRY 2.7B). P/B: KUTPO leads (0.60 vs 1.60). EV/EBITDA: KUTPO leads (4.40 vs 7.70). EV/Sales: KUTPO leads (1.32 vs 2.05). Gross margin: KUTPO leads (31.44% vs 13.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): KUTPO leads (22.68% vs 12.63%). Net margin (annual): GLRMK leads (8.37% vs −0.82%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GLRMK or KUTPO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (11.71 vs —); by P/B, KUTPO trades at the lower multiple (1.60 vs 0.60).
Which is more profitable, GLRMK or KUTPO?
Annual net margin is 8.37% for GLRMK and −0.82% for KUTPO; return on equity is 17.35% for GLRMK and −0.73% for KUTPO.
Which is more leveraged, GLRMK or KUTPO?
The leverage ratio is 64.52 for GLRMK and 18.09 for KUTPO; net debt/EBITDA is −0.07 for GLRMK and −0.11 for KUTPO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.