GIPTA vs IMASM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GIPTA and IMASM side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GIPTA | IMASM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 31.14 | 1.54 | 16.69 |
| Daily change | −1.14% | −4.94% | −4.50% |
| Market cap | TRY 4.1B | TRY 1.4B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/B | 1.16 | 0.43 | 1.28 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | — | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −9.37% | −14.10% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 45.46% | 70.18% | 34.99% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GIPTA vs IMASM comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GIPTA (Gipta Ofis Kirtasiye) and IMASM (Imas Makina) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:31. Of the 15 metrics compared, GIPTA leads in 13 and IMASM leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: GIPTA leads (−1.14% vs −4.94%). Market cap: GIPTA leads (TRY 4.1B vs TRY 1.4B). P/B: IMASM leads (0.43 vs 1.16). EV/EBITDA: GIPTA leads (7.35 vs 12.89). EV/Sales: IMASM leads (1.67 vs 6.37). Gross margin: GIPTA leads (46.90% vs 39.29%). EBITDA margin (annual): GIPTA leads (20.03% vs 12.61%). Net margin (annual): GIPTA leads (−15.29% vs −17.40%).
Frequently asked questions
Is GIPTA or IMASM cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, IMASM trades at the lower multiple (1.16 vs 0.43).
Which is more profitable, GIPTA or IMASM?
Annual net margin is −15.29% for GIPTA and −17.40% for IMASM; return on equity is −9.37% for GIPTA and −14.10% for IMASM.
Which is more leveraged, GIPTA or IMASM?
The leverage ratio is 17.75 for GIPTA and 44.90 for IMASM; net debt/EBITDA is −4.05 for GIPTA and 1.83 for IMASM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.