GIPTA vs HURGZ Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GIPTA and HURGZ side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GIPTA | HURGZ | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 30.56 | 5.50 | 16.68 |
| Daily change | −2.98% | −8.33% | −4.85% |
| Market cap | TRY 4B | TRY 3.3B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/B | 1.16 | 2.33 | 1.24 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | — | 2.52% |
| Return on equity | −9.37% | −72.99% | −1.04% |
| Free float | 45.46% | 18.70% | 34.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GIPTA vs HURGZ Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GIPTA (Gipta Ofis Kirtasiye) and HURGZ (Hurriyet Gzt.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:51. Of the 14 metrics compared, GIPTA leads in 12 and HURGZ leads in 2.
Highlights: Daily change: GIPTA leads (−2.98% vs −8.33%). Market cap: GIPTA leads (TRY 4B vs TRY 3.3B). P/B: GIPTA leads (1.16 vs 2.33). EV/EBITDA: GIPTA leads (7.35 vs −5.43). EV/Sales: HURGZ leads (6.18 vs 6.37). Gross margin: GIPTA leads (46.90% vs −20.50%). EBITDA margin (annual): GIPTA leads (20.03% vs −58.80%). Net margin (annual): GIPTA leads (−15.29% vs −136.37%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GIPTA or HURGZ cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, GIPTA trades at the lower multiple (1.16 vs 2.33).
Which is more profitable, GIPTA or HURGZ?
Annual net margin is −15.29% for GIPTA and −136.37% for HURGZ; return on equity is −9.37% for GIPTA and −72.99% for HURGZ.
Which is more leveraged, GIPTA or HURGZ?
The leverage ratio is 17.75 for GIPTA and 69.32 for HURGZ; net debt/EBITDA is −4.05 for GIPTA and — for HURGZ. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.