GENKM vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of GENKM and TUPRS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GENKM | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 5.94 | 352.25 | 12.26 |
| Daily change | −0.17% | −1.95% | −3.36% |
| Market cap | TRY 3.6B | TRY 678.7B | TRY 3.4B |
| P/E | — | 9.52 | 13.91 |
| P/B | 0.52 | 1.52 | 0.94 |
| Dividend yield | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.06% |
| Return on equity | −0.64% | 18.20% | 1.85% |
| Free float | 19.73% | 49.03% | 36.46% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GENKM vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of GENKM (Gentas Kimya) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Oct 22, 2026, 18:19. Of the 14 metrics compared, GENKM leads in 7 and TUPRS leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: GENKM leads (−0.17% vs −1.95%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 678.7B vs TRY 3.6B). P/B: GENKM leads (0.52 vs 1.52). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (5.54 vs 915.81). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.85 vs 1.08). Dividend yield: TUPRS leads (1.78% vs 1.62%). Gross margin: GENKM leads (23.81% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): TUPRS leads (10.32% vs −7,644.14%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GENKM or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs 9.52); by P/B, GENKM trades at the lower multiple (0.52 vs 1.52).
Which is more profitable, GENKM or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 90.64% for GENKM and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is −0.64% for GENKM and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, GENKM or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 18.00 for GENKM and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is — for GENKM and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.