FROTO vs RUBNS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and RUBNS side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FROTO | RUBNS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.95 | 18.09 | 20.77 |
| Daily change | −2.41% | −10.00% | −4.16% |
| Market cap | TRY 263B | TRY 1.5B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | 258.11 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.47 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | 0.21% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 58.84% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FROTO vs RUBNS comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and RUBNS (Rubenis Tekstil) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:31. Of the 16 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 7 and RUBNS leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.41% vs −10.00%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263B vs TRY 1.5B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 258.11). P/B: RUBNS leads (0.47 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: RUBNS leads (6.84 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 2.83). Gross margin: RUBNS leads (25.21% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): RUBNS leads (17.98% vs 6.30%).
Frequently asked questions
Is FROTO or RUBNS cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (8.12 vs 258.11); by P/B, RUBNS trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.47).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or RUBNS?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and 0.42% for RUBNS; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and 0.21% for RUBNS.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or RUBNS?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 17.12 for RUBNS; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 0.73 for RUBNS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.