FROTO vs REEDR Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and REEDR side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | REEDR | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 75.05 | 3.59 | 20.53 |
| Daily change | −2.28% | −9.57% | −4.97% |
| Market cap | TRY 263.4B | TRY 3.4B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | — | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.51 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | −14.80% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 64.10% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs REEDR Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and REEDR (Reeder Teknoloji) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:43. Of the 15 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 8 and REEDR leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.28% vs −9.57%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.4B vs TRY 3.4B). P/B: REEDR leads (0.51 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 10.74). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 5.44). Gross margin: REEDR leads (18.72% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): REEDR leads (42.52% vs 6.30%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −75.98%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or REEDR cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.12 vs —); by P/B, REEDR trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.51).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or REEDR?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and −75.98% for REEDR; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and −14.80% for REEDR.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or REEDR?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 23.61 for REEDR; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 0.73 for REEDR. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.