FROTO vs MSGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and MSGYO side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | MSGYO | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.50 | 4.63 | 20.13 |
| Daily change | −2.99% | −5.51% | −6.06% |
| Market cap | TRY 261.4B | TRY 2.2B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | — | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.43 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | 5.27% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | −0.89% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 27.96% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs MSGYO Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and MSGYO (Mistral GMYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:02. Of the 13 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 7 and MSGYO leads in 6.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.99% vs −5.51%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 261.4B vs TRY 2.2B). P/B: MSGYO leads (0.43 vs 1.50). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 189.66). Dividend yield: MSGYO leads (5.27% vs 3.36%). Gross margin: MSGYO leads (93.31% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): MSGYO leads (115.46% vs 6.30%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −4.02%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or MSGYO cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.12 vs —); by P/B, MSGYO trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.43).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or MSGYO?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and −4.02% for MSGYO; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and −0.89% for MSGYO.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or MSGYO?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 21.91 for MSGYO; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and — for MSGYO. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.