FROTO vs MARMR Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and MARMR side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | MARMR | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 75.05 | 1.44 | 20.53 |
| Daily change | −2.28% | −7.10% | −4.82% |
| Market cap | TRY 263.4B | TRY 4.3B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | — | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 1.08 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | — | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 31.64% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs MARMR Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and MARMR (Marmara Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:47. Of the 7 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 4 and MARMR leads in 3.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.28% vs −7.10%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.4B vs TRY 4.3B). P/B: MARMR leads (1.08 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs −255.78). Return on assets: FROTO leads (7.24% vs −21.32%). Current ratio: MARMR leads (218.95 vs 1.28). Leverage ratio: MARMR leads (0.46 vs 63.37).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or MARMR cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.12 vs —); by P/B, MARMR trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 1.08).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or MARMR?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and — for MARMR; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and — for MARMR.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or MARMR?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 0.46 for MARMR; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and — for MARMR. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.