FROTO vs KZBGY Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and KZBGY side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | KZBGY | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 75.00 | 1.36 | 20.52 |
| Daily change | −2.34% | −4.23% | −5.17% |
| Market cap | TRY 263.2B | TRY 5.4B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | 10.50 | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.22 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | 2.36% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 34.78% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs KZBGY Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and KZBGY (Kizilbuk GYO) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 13:51. Of the 16 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 9 and KZBGY leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.34% vs −4.23%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.2B vs TRY 5.4B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 10.50). P/B: KZBGY leads (0.22 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 13.85). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 9.28). Gross margin: KZBGY leads (78.16% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): KZBGY leads (49.08% vs 6.30%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or KZBGY cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (8.12 vs 10.50); by P/B, KZBGY trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.22).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or KZBGY?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and 30.47% for KZBGY; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and 2.36% for KZBGY.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or KZBGY?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 39.02 for KZBGY; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 5.40 for KZBGY. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.