FROTO vs KUVVA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and KUVVA side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | KUVVA | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.85 | 100.80 | 20.24 |
| Daily change | −2.54% | −9.92% | −5.85% |
| Market cap | TRY 262.7B | TRY 3.1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | — | 15.47 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 7.25 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | −50.84% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 76.40% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs KUVVA Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and KUVVA (Kuvva Gida) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:49. Of the 15 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 11 and KUVVA leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.54% vs −9.92%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 262.7B vs TRY 3.1B). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 7.25). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 15.03). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 27.42). Gross margin: KUVVA leads (9.87% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): KUVVA leads (42.20% vs 6.30%). Net margin (annual): FROTO leads (4.28% vs −41.93%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or KUVVA cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (8.12 vs —); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 7.25).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or KUVVA?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and −41.93% for KUVVA; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and −50.84% for KUVVA.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or KUVVA?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 83.24 for KUVVA; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 2.13 for KUVVA. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.