FROTO vs KIMMR Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and KIMMR side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | KIMMR | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.50 | 10.88 | 20.13 |
| Daily change | −2.99% | −3.97% | −6.06% |
| Market cap | TRY 261.4B | TRY 2.6B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | 3.79 | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.52 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | 1.29% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | 15.71% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 26.52% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs KIMMR Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and KIMMR (Kim Market-Ersan Alisveris) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:02. Of the 17 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 6 and KIMMR leads in 11.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.99% vs −3.97%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 261.4B vs TRY 2.6B). P/E: KIMMR leads (3.79 vs 8.12). P/B: KIMMR leads (0.52 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: KIMMR leads (2.77 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: KIMMR leads (0.40 vs 0.89). Dividend yield: FROTO leads (3.36% vs 1.29%). Gross margin: KIMMR leads (23.89% vs 6.87%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or KIMMR cheaper?
By P/E, KIMMR is cheaper (8.12 vs 3.79); by P/B, KIMMR trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.52).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or KIMMR?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and 4.78% for KIMMR; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and 15.71% for KIMMR.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or KIMMR?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 52.09 for KIMMR; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 0.33 for KIMMR. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.