FROTO vs INGRM Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and INGRM side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FROTO | INGRM | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 75.20 | 306.00 | 20.61 |
| Daily change | −2.08% | −2.93% | −4.25% |
| Market cap | TRY 263.9B | TRY 7.3B | TRY 3.8B |
| P/E | 8.12 | 8,810.59 | 16.24 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 3.55 | 1.17 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | 1.95% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | 0.04% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 8.40% | 34.94% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FROTO vs INGRM comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and INGRM (Ingram Bilişim) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 12:19. Of the 17 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 13 and INGRM leads in 4.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.08% vs −2.93%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 263.9B vs TRY 7.3B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 8,810.59). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 3.55). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 15.23). EV/Sales: INGRM leads (0.77 vs 0.89). Dividend yield: FROTO leads (3.36% vs 1.95%). Gross margin: FROTO leads (6.87% vs 5.64%).
Frequently asked questions
Is FROTO or INGRM cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (8.12 vs 8,810.59); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 3.55).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or INGRM?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and 0.00% for INGRM; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and 0.04% for INGRM.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or INGRM?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 87.25 for INGRM; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and 5.34 for INGRM. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.