FROTO vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and GUBRF side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | GUBRF | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.60 | 435.00 | 20.30 |
| Daily change | −2.86% | −5.02% | −5.59% |
| Market cap | TRY 261.8B | TRY 145.3B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | 19.22 | 15.42 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 3.89 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | 23.87% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 20.28% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs GUBRF Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and GUBRF (Gübre Fabrik.) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:18. Of the 16 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 6 and GUBRF leads in 10.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.86% vs −5.02%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 261.8B vs TRY 145.3B). P/E: FROTO leads (8.12 vs 19.22). P/B: FROTO leads (1.50 vs 3.89). EV/EBITDA: FROTO leads (9.18 vs 11.70). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs 3.90). Gross margin: GUBRF leads (26.69% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): GUBRF leads (22.84% vs 6.30%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or GUBRF cheaper?
By P/E, FROTO is cheaper (8.12 vs 19.22); by P/B, FROTO trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 3.89).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or GUBRF?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and 13.44% for GUBRF; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and 23.87% for GUBRF.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or GUBRF?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 41.50 for GUBRF; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and −0.39 for GUBRF. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.