FROTO vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FROTO and GLRYH side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FROTO | GLRYH | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 74.80 | 1.74 | 20.24 |
| Daily change | −2.60% | −4.40% | −5.85% |
| Market cap | TRY 262.5B | TRY 1B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 8.12 | 2.32 | 15.47 |
| P/B | 1.50 | 0.19 | 1.09 |
| Dividend yield | 3.36% | — | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 19.65% | 9.45% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 17.66% | 79.42% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FROTO vs GLRYH Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FROTO (Ford Otosan) and GLRYH (Guler Yat. Holding) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:50. Of the 15 metrics compared, FROTO leads in 6 and GLRYH leads in 9.
Highlights: Daily change: FROTO leads (−2.60% vs −4.40%). Market cap: FROTO leads (TRY 262.5B vs TRY 1B). P/E: GLRYH leads (2.32 vs 8.12). P/B: GLRYH leads (0.19 vs 1.50). EV/EBITDA: GLRYH leads (3.13 vs 9.18). EV/Sales: FROTO leads (0.89 vs −2.71). Gross margin: GLRYH leads (47.63% vs 6.87%). EBITDA margin (annual): FROTO leads (6.30% vs −42.31%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FROTO or GLRYH cheaper?
By P/E, GLRYH is cheaper (8.12 vs 2.32); by P/B, GLRYH trades at the lower multiple (1.50 vs 0.19).
Which is more profitable, FROTO or GLRYH?
Annual net margin is 4.28% for FROTO and 41.94% for GLRYH; return on equity is 19.65% for FROTO and 9.45% for GLRYH.
Which is more leveraged, FROTO or GLRYH?
The leverage ratio is 63.37 for FROTO and 37.89 for GLRYH; net debt/EBITDA is 2.29 for FROTO and — for GLRYH. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.