FRMPL vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FRMPL and TUPRS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FRMPL | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 22.98 | 398.00 | 18.72 |
| Daily change | −4.41% | −1.97% | −5.96% |
| Market cap | TRY 3.7B | TRY 766.9B | TRY 4.3B |
| P/E | 16.17 | 10.75 | 17.25 |
| P/B | 0.97 | 1.72 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.00% | 0.90% |
| Return on equity | 6.01% | 18.20% | 1.78% |
| Free float | 25.00% | 49.42% | 37.21% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FRMPL vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FRMPL (Formul Plastik ve Metal) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 15:54. Of the 14 metrics compared, FRMPL leads in 7 and TUPRS leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−1.97% vs −4.41%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 766.9B vs TRY 3.7B). P/E: TUPRS leads (10.75 vs 16.17). P/B: FRMPL leads (0.97 vs 1.72). EV/EBITDA: FRMPL leads (5.24 vs 6.43). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 2.15). Gross margin: FRMPL leads (31.58% vs 12.69%). EBITDA margin (annual): TUPRS leads (10.32% vs −0.52%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FRMPL or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, TUPRS is cheaper (16.17 vs 10.75); by P/B, FRMPL trades at the lower multiple (0.97 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, FRMPL or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 7.25% for FRMPL and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 6.01% for FRMPL and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, FRMPL or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 35.29 for FRMPL and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is — for FRMPL and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.