FORMT vs TTRAK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FORMT and TTRAK side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FORMT | TTRAK | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 0.89 | 363.00 | 12.28 |
| Daily change | 0.00% | −0.55% | −3.24% |
| Market cap | TRY 1B | TRY 36.3B | TRY 2.7B |
| P/B | 0.37 | 1.92 | 0.80 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.12% | 1.60% |
| Return on equity | −5.43% | −5.13% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 89.04% | 24.08% | 34.90% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FORMT vs TTRAK Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FORMT (Formet Metal ve Cam) and TTRAK (Türk Traktor) side by side as of Oct 22, 2026, 18:19. Of the 14 metrics compared, FORMT leads in 7 and TTRAK leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: FORMT leads (0.00% vs −0.55%). Market cap: TTRAK leads (TRY 36.3B vs TRY 1B). P/B: FORMT leads (0.37 vs 1.92). EV/EBITDA: TTRAK leads (17.92 vs −58.39). EV/Sales: TTRAK leads (1.92 vs 2.19). Gross margin: FORMT leads (22.92% vs 7.91%). EBITDA margin (annual): TTRAK leads (8.53% vs −2.33%). Net margin (annual): TTRAK leads (−2.11% vs −14.97%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FORMT or TTRAK cheaper?
By P/E, Tie is cheaper (— vs —); by P/B, FORMT trades at the lower multiple (0.37 vs 1.92).
Which is more profitable, FORMT or TTRAK?
Annual net margin is −14.97% for FORMT and −2.11% for TTRAK; return on equity is −5.43% for FORMT and −5.13% for TTRAK.
Which is more leveraged, FORMT or TTRAK?
The leverage ratio is 22.17 for FORMT and 55.16 for TTRAK; net debt/EBITDA is — for FORMT and 2.43 for TTRAK. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.