FMIZP vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation, profitability and leverage metrics of FMIZP and TUPRS side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FMIZP | TUPRS | Sector median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last price (TL) | 270.75 | 397.50 | 20.27 |
| Daily change | −2.26% | −2.09% | −5.84% |
| Market cap | TRY 3.9B | TRY 765.9B | TRY 3.7B |
| P/E | 28.02 | 10.75 | 15.42 |
| P/B | 5.55 | 1.72 | 1.08 |
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | 4.00% | 1.50% |
| Return on equity | 20.90% | 18.20% | −4.60% |
| Free float | 22.20% | 49.42% | 34.94% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FMIZP vs TUPRS Comparison
Price, market cap, valuation multiples, profitability and leverage of FMIZP (F-M Izmit Piston) and TUPRS (Tüpraş) side by side as of Sep 28, 2026, 14:24. Of the 17 metrics compared, FMIZP leads in 10 and TUPRS leads in 7.
Highlights: Daily change: TUPRS leads (−2.09% vs −2.26%). Market cap: TUPRS leads (TRY 765.9B vs TRY 3.9B). P/E: TUPRS leads (10.75 vs 28.02). P/B: TUPRS leads (1.72 vs 5.55). EV/EBITDA: TUPRS leads (6.43 vs 25.47). EV/Sales: TUPRS leads (0.98 vs 8.22). Dividend yield: TUPRS leads (4.00% vs 1.60%). Gross margin: FMIZP leads (24.61% vs 12.69%).
Frequently Asked Questions
Is FMIZP or TUPRS cheaper?
By P/E, TUPRS is cheaper (28.02 vs 10.75); by P/B, TUPRS trades at the lower multiple (5.55 vs 1.72).
Which is more profitable, FMIZP or TUPRS?
Annual net margin is 18.62% for FMIZP and 7.07% for TUPRS; return on equity is 20.90% for FMIZP and 18.20% for TUPRS.
Which is more leveraged, FMIZP or TUPRS?
The leverage ratio is 16.28 for FMIZP and 46.13 for TUPRS; net debt/EBITDA is −3.05 for FMIZP and −1.23 for TUPRS. Lower values mean less leverage.
Where does the comparison data come from?
Prices and market caps come from 15-minute delayed Borsa Istanbul data; ratios are calculated from the latest financial statements filed with KAP. Some ratios are not defined for banks and insurers.